Programme Specifications Guidance

If another College or School in the University will contribute to the programme (usually by running one or more modules on the programme) this needs to be indicated. New programmes/programme modifications will be approved by the owning School (and any module-level paperwork will be approved by the area that owns the module). Ensure that the partner area is consulted when changes are made to the programme. 

This box should be completed if the programme will be delivered in collaboration with an organisation outside of the University of Birmingham. The Quality Assurance Agency defines this as 'provision that leads to the award of academic credit and that is delivered, assessed or supported in partnership between two or more organisations', e.g. 'provision where the achievement of learning outcomes for the module or course are dependent on the arrangements made between the organisations.' 

If the programme will be collaborative with another organisation, please state the organisation's name and the type of collaboration, e.g. Joint Degree or Validation.

When creating a new collaborative programme, before engaging with the programme approval process, a Collaborative Approval in Principle must be approved by the University. 

• Apprenticeships and Partnerships Team
• UoB's Teaching Collaborations
• Proposing a New Programme

Please select whether the programme will be Specialist, Joint, or Integrated (for UG programmes), or Classic or Flexible (for PG programmes). 

Categories of Undergraduate Programmes

At Undergraduate level, programmes will be designated (internally) as either Specialist, Joint, or Integrated:

• Specialist: ‘Single degree’, where students focus predominantly on one subject area, e.g. BSc Physics and BA History. Such degrees may include the option of specialist minors, i.e. a sub-area of the overall subject area, e.g. BSc Physics with Astrophysics.
• Joint: ‘Joint degree’, where students either pair two different subject areas and take approximately the same number of credits in each, or pair two different subject areas and take more credits in one than the other (with the latter generally being known as a ‘Major/Minor degree’). Examples include BA History and Politics and BA English with History.
• Integrated: ‘Multidisciplinary degree’, where students synthesise different subject areas, e.g. BSc Global Environmental Changes and Sustainability, BSc Human Sciences, BA Policy, Politics and Economics, and BA/BSc Liberal Arts and Natural Sciences.

Stage 1 of Undergraduate degrees will normally include a substantial ‘core’ element, to provide students with a foundation that facilitates pathway personalisation at Stage 2 and beyond.

There will normally be a minimum of 40 credits of project/dissertation (i.e. research project(s) appropriate to the subject area and level) at Stage 3. 

 

Categories of Postgraduate Taught Programmes

At Postgraduate Taught level, programmes will be designated (internally) as either Classic or Flexible.

• Classic: PGCert, PGDip and PGT Master’s degrees delivered on a FT or PT basis.
• Flexible: PGCert, PGDip and PGT Master’s degrees delivered at least partly on a flexible basis (i.e. via stacked PG Microcredentials). 

PGT Master’s degree students may have a ‘specialism’ in brackets after their degree title, if they undertake 100 credits (i.e. 40 credits of taught modules and the dissertation) in a specialist area of the overall degree subject area. Credit requirements for Postgraduate Taught programmes remain otherwise unchanged. 

This section indicates the qualifications that will appear on students' transcripts, e.g. 'BA History'. Please include any alternative qualifications, i.e. qualifications available if a student exits early, and ensure these are clearly marked, e.g. 'PGDip Politics [alternative qual. only]'.

Higher Education Classification of Subjects (HECoS) codes replaced JACS codes from 18/19 onwards. They are used by a range of stakeholders to classify subjects of study for several purposes, including league tables and National Student Survey results publication. If you are unsure of which HECoS code to choose, please contact your College Planning Partner.

The programme aims should include (but are not limited to):

• A general overview of the programme and its content, focussing on any innovative or distinctive elements.
• The skills that students will develop over the programme, both generic and specific to the subject.
• The experiences students will have (you can mention here any placements that are a core part of the programme).
• A description of the areas of work or further study to which graduates might progress.

Recommended:

• Keeping the aims short and concise, e.g. approximately 400 words, so that students, those approving the programme, and those teaching on the programme can quickly and easily understand what the programme is aiming to achieve. (Note that the length of this field in the Banner records system is 4000 characters (including spaces), so programme aims cannot exceed this).
• Using student-focused language, as the aims will be visible to students via the Programmes and Modules Handbook. Making the aims student-focused also means they can more easily be used in marketing communications. 

Not Recommended:

• Including detailed information regarding structure and delivery, e.g. naming modules, providing details of assessments, listing the numbers of seminars and lectures, or naming teaching staff, as these are all subject to change in the future.
• Including hyperlinks and/or graphs or photos, as these cannot be displayed on the Programmes and Modules Handbook.
• Using jargon/acronyms that are not readily accessible to non-specialists.

The QAA Subject Benchmark Statements should be used as reference points in programme design. The statements, written by subject specialists, 'describe the nature of study and the academic standards expected of graduates in specific subject areas. They show what graduates might reasonably be expected to know, do and understand at the end of their studies.' Using the statements in programme design, therefore, ensures the programme is coherent and that it enables students to develop skills as appropriate to the subject matter. 

On the specification you need to outline how a statement was used, e.g. to inform the content of the programme or to ensure the appropriate level in the learning outcomes.

Make sure you refer to the full name of the particular subject benchmark statement(s) used in your answer. It is also recommended that you provide one or two specific examples of how the programme has been informed by the relevant statement. For example, you could quote a key programme outcome, and then quote the specific section(s) of the Subject Benchmark Statements from which it was derived. For example:

‘Subject benchmark statement used: X. The content of the programme, aims of the programme, and the programme outcomes have been formulated using the above subject benchmark statement. This is shown by the breadth and depth of subject specific knowledge/understanding and generic skills-based programme outcomes, which correspond to the relevant sections of the subject benchmark statement. The statement has also informed the level of educational challenge and standard of academic achievement that successful students are expected to demonstrate via the chosen assessment methods.’

Or:

‘The above-named subject benchmark statement has been used to inform the content of the programme, as well as the aims and the nature and standard of the programme outcomes (and the corresponding learning, teaching, and assessment methods).’

Or:

‘The content of the programme, aims, and programme outcomes have all been formulated using the above-named subject benchmark statement. In particular, the programme outcomes have been mapped against the subject specific knowledge/skills and the generic skills outlined in the statement.’

Or:

‘Though there is not a subject-specific benchmark statement for X, the benchmark statements for the related subjects of Y and Z have nonetheless been consulted in order to inform, in a general way, the aims of the degree and the knowledge and skills to be demonstrated through it, as well as general principles for teaching, learning, assessment, and standards.’

Subject Benchmark Statements are periodically reviewed by the QAA, so if the statement that relates to your programme has been updated since the programme was first set up/last modified please refer to the revised statement, making any modifications to the programme/modules as required. Ensuring programmes align to the latest benchmarks is one of the ways we keep our programmes up-to-date and representative of current thinking and practices in the relevant subject matter.

• Subject Benchmark Statements

The OfS Sector Recognised Standards are available to download from here (PDF - 201KB). On the programme specification you need to state to which level of the Standards your programme corresponds. Foundation degrees correspond to Level 5, Honours degrees to Level 6, Master's degrees to Level 7, and Doctoral degrees to Level 8.  

You should also state how the Standards were used, e.g. in determining the name of the qualification.

The text below provides examples of good practice with regard to the use of the OfS Sector-recognised Standards. It is also recommended that you provide one or two specific examples of how the programme has been informed by the OfS Standards. For example, you could quote one of the core aspects of the relevant qualification descriptor in the Standards and indicate to which of the programme outcomes it is particularly closely linked.

‘The programme corresponds to Level 6 of the OfS Sector-recognised Standards. The Standards have helped to define the level of academic achievement which is expected of students and this is reflected in the programme outcomes.’

Or:

‘The programme corresponds to Level 7 of the OfS Sector-recognised Standards. The qualification descriptor has informed the level of academic achievement expected of students (please see the programme outcomes) and, following on from this, the teaching, learning and assessment methods used on the programme.’

Or:

‘The programme corresponds to Level 6 of the OfS Sector-recognised Standards. The programme is aligned with the generic statement of outcomes set out in the qualification descriptor for Level 6 within the Standards. The programme outcomes are therefore derived from the list of abilities/skills that successful students typically demonstrate. The programme has been designed to ensure that graduates have the appropriate transferable skills and qualities for their future employment.’

The QAA has published a series of Characteristics Statements, covering Master's degrees, Doctoral degrees, Foundation degrees, and Apprenticeships, which describe the distinctive features of qualifications at those levels within the Qualifications Frameworks. They describe the qualifications in terms of their purpose, general characteristics, and generic outcomes, but do not include subject level detail.

If the programme covered by the specification is a PG programme, Foundation programme, or an Apprenticeship, please detail in the specification how the programme corresponds to the relevant Characteristics Statement. 

If the programme is subject to accreditation, the programme specification should state how the requirements/guidelines of the Professional, Statutory and Regulatory Bodies (PSRB) have informed the design of the programme. As an example, ‘the programme learning outcomes are based on those published by IChemE’ or ‘the programme includes 30 hours of work-based learning’.

The programme should be regularly reviewed to ensure it aligns with the PSRB's requirements, as these are subject to change. This is also a way of ensuring that the programme aligns to the latest industrial and professional developments. 

As a University, we are committed to ensuring that our programmes and modules are inclusive of all students including: international, part-time, mature, those from different socio-economic backgrounds (class) and those with protected characteristics according to the Equality Act 2010 (age, disability, gender reassignment, marriage/civil partnership, race, religion or belief, sex, sexual orientation).

All programmes and modules should therefore seek to promote equality of opportunity through ensuring they pose no barriers to applications, access, or progression for any student who meets the admissions criteria.

Comment briefly on how your School/Department promotes equality of opportunity through ensuring no barriers are posed to applications, access or progression for any protected group.

The below Micro CPD provides guidance on completing this section of the programme specification. 

 

 

• Equality, Diversity and Inclusion
• Student Services

The specification requires you to state how your programme embeds Education for Sustainability and the United Nations’s Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) together with the University’s sustainability goals. In this answer you should refer to the Birmingham Teaching and Learning handbook and the three guiding principles to embed sustainability into our teaching and learning. Examples of good practice are also included there. Answers may highlight which of the principles are included and specific examples of how/where they are achieved, with reference to specific modules or activities (e.g. a tutorial) and whether or not they are core or optional. Highlighting key examples, showing development throughout the years is useful here, specifics about assessments and skills should be included at a module level. You should also refer to the benchmarking statement for your subject area (recently updated ones will include reference to sustainability in relation to your discipline area). 

If you are unsure about how/where to embed sustainability into your degree programme, or whether it is possible, please contact the Academic Director of Sustainability Education (Prof Julia Myatt; j.p.myatt@bham.ac.uk) in the first instance to discuss ideas or reasons why. If following discussion both parties agree it is not practical/possible include a statement to that effect below, including notes from the discussion.

Example: All students will undertake a group activity in a core tutorial in the first year following completion of the Sustainability in Action online training course. This will highlight the relevance of sustainability for their discipline and how/where they can be more sustainable and promote change in their everyday lives (aligns with principles one and three). All core modules in the first year highlight which SDGs are relevant to that module in their introductory lectures, and highlight them at key points e.g. when specific case studies are provided, highlighting integration across the three pillars. Through this approach the following main SDGs are covered: SDGs 2; 3; 13; 14 and 15 (aligns with principles one and two). There are a number of modules in the second and final year which specifically focus on key elements of sustainability, these include  ‘example one’, ‘example two’ and ‘example three’. ‘Example one’ is core and includes a group project with external organisations which includes topics focused on sustainability (principles one, two and three). A number of dissertation topics provided also include sustainability as a core element e.g. ‘example one’ and ‘example two’.

The specification requires you to detail any regulatory exemptions that have been approved for the programme or have been requested (if the specification is for a new programme). 

The specification asks whether students on the programme will be subject to Fitness to Practise regulations. These regulations ensure that students meet professional standards of conduct for awards that lead to a professionally recognised qualification, for example Medicine, Initial Teacher Training, Dentistry, and Social Work. Students who register on these programmes must sign and abide by a programme-specific Code of Professional Conduct.

Further information can be obtained from Student Conduct, including a list of programmes currently subject to Fitness to Practise regulations. 

• Fitness to Practise Guidance
• Student Conduct

The learning outcomes are the minimum requirements students must meet in order to pass the programme, rather than a description of the content aims (which should be covered in the 'programme aims' section). They must be aligned to the relevant QAA benchmark statements and frameworks (see section above) to ensure that they have the appropriate level of rigour and difficulty, and should signal to students the programme's unique selling point.

The learning outcomes are divided into ‘Students are expected to have knowledge and understanding of’ and ‘Students are expected to have attained the following skills and other attributes’. Each row below should contain a different outcome under these headings, i.e. knowledge and understanding relevant to the subject matter, and other skills relevant to the subject matter including, but not limited to, cognitive skills, practical skills, transferable skills, and professional competencies. 

The next section/column should outline the corresponding teaching and learning methods that will be employed to ensure students can achieve the stated outcome, e.g. ‘lectures’, ‘completion of dissertation’, ‘guided research’, ‘laboratory demonstrations’, 'workshops', etc.

All learning outcomes must be assessed by means of a summative assessment, which is detailed in the next section/column: failure to achieve all stated learning outcomes results in a student’s failure on the programme. All students should be assessed effectively, i.e. assessed in a challenging and appropriately comprehensive way, by reference to the subject matter. This includes providing stretch and rigour consistent with the level of the course and the testing relevant skills.

The next column requires you to detail the level of qualification associated with fulfilment of this learning outcome. If more than one qualification may be available (including alternative qualifications) it is important to be able to distinguish which learning outcomes relate to each level of qualification. For example, for a BSc the last column would be ‘CertHE/DipHE/BSc’ for learning outcomes that would be met in the first year of the course (after which a student could exit with a Certificate of Higher Education), whereas just ‘BSc’ would indicate that the learning outcomes would only be met in the final year, e.g. research skills that are assessed via a final year dissertation. 

In the final column (where this is separate) you should state the subject, major, minor, specialism, pathway etc. to which the learning outcome relates. For example, the learning outcome could be linked to History (i.e. a single honours subject), an English major, Computer Science minor, or a particular interdisciplinary pathway. Where there is a separate column for the subject, this can be left blank if not relevant.

Additional guidance on devising programme learning outcomes is available from Educational Development.

This section is used to detail the modules that form the programme. It is expected that, when the programme is designed, the modules will introduce the subject and skills in an appropriate order, building on them throughout the programme as relevant.

The programme requirements are usually divided into three tables (note that the tables and rows can be added/deleted as required). The expectation is that for UG programmes the first section would outline 120 credits of LC modules, which would lead to a Certificate of Higher Education (CertHE), with the pathways and ‘exit routes’ potentially available to students at the end of Stage 1 clearly articulated. This would be followed by 120 credits at LI, leading to 240 credits and a Diploma of Higher Education (DipHE), and the final section the last 120 credits, leading to 360 credits in total and the relevant Bachelor’s degree (BA, BSc etc.).

For Master's programmes, the three sections can be used to detail the modules required for the different potential exit qualifications: PG Certificate (60 credits), PG Diploma (120 credits), and a Master's (180 credits). Alternatively, for full-time Master's with no alternative exit qualifications, only one section needs to be used.

The columns should be used to list the modules’ title, credits, level, module code (if known), date from which any changes are effective, and the semester of delivery.

The module title column can also be used to note if a module has a module attribute, by placing this in brackets after the title. Module attributes are relevant where it is useful to put modules into categories, e.g. putting modules into subject-based categories on a specialist programme to indicate which modules can contribute to any specialist minors if not already obvious, or putting modules into a themed category, such as ‘Languages for All modules’. 

The ‘effective from’ column should be used to indicate from when the relevant module/change is effective. For example, for a new standard 3-year UG programme launching in 26/27, the LC modules would be effective from 26/27, the LI modules from 27/28, and LH modules from 29/30. This section is also important when making modifications to programmes and allows you to make phased changes, e.g. if a series of modules are being introduced over a few years. If modules are being withdrawn, they should be struck through on the specification and the ‘effective from’ should indicate the first year in which it will no longer run.

Ensure you detail any rules that dictate the choice of optional modules, e.g. 'students must choose 60 credits from the following list'.

If there are any modules that must be passed in order to pass the degree (rather than attempted) please ensure these are clearly noted on the programme requirements, e.g. 'It is a specific requirement of this programme that students must pass the [name] module in order to be awarded an Honours degree'. If multiple modules must be passed, these could be noted with an asterisk (making it clear what the asterisk denotes). 

A ‘half’ programme specification covers only one part of a course, i.e. it is a specification that only has the programme aims, learning outcomes, and modules related to, e.g., a major, minor, one half of a joint course, or an intercalated year. In deciding how to approach the paperwork, please consider the below; either approach is valid, but colleagues should consider mitigation of the cons for each.  

A ‘half’ specification approach could be particularly appropriate if:

• You’re creating a major/minor that could be slotted into multiple other degrees, and you don’t necessarily know what these are yet. 
• The major/minor has clear standalone aims, learning outcomes, and modules that can be clearly indicated on the specification.
• You’re setting up an intercalated year that can be added to multiple other degrees. 

Pros of the ‘half’ specification approach: 

• Less paperwork, as you only add the aims, learning outcomes, and modules that relate to one part of the degree. 
• The specification can be shared with other areas across UoB, so they can consider whether they wish to add the major/minor to their degrees.
• It is clear which School/Institute and College should lead on the approval of the paperwork (areas are always strongly advised to consult with any other areas of the University that may be affected by any programme developments). 

Cons: 

• The degree is not reviewed as a whole, therefore major/minor or joint degrees could appear to be less coherent, e.g. there could be repetition across learning outcomes (note it is expected that there is always communication between ‘partner’ Schools/Institutes).
• Similarly, it would be more difficult to ensure that students would gain the Graduate Attributes across the course as a whole.  

Having a whole specification for the degree, covering both elements, could be particularly appropriate if: 

• The programme is based on an existing joint degree that has a combined specification for both halves, e.g. a major/minor or joint degree that is based on an existing joint honours programme.
• There will be a limited number of combinations, e.g. courses with a defined major/minor.
• The programme is an interdisciplinary degree.  

Pros:  

• Ensures the programme learning outcomes and modules are coherent and complementary, and avoids any repetition, as they will be approached as a whole.
• Makes it easier to identify any potential gaps in Graduate Attributes or incoherence in other elements of the specification. 
• Clearly indicates which combinations of subjects are permitted. 
• Allows the course to be considered in terms of the appropriateness of the fit of the major and minor. 

Cons: 

• Could be harder to offer either part as a standalone major/minor to other areas as the different parts cannot be easily separated.