CardsOnline Accessibility Statement

This accessibility statement applies to https://adminidcards.bham.ac.uk

This website is run by the University of Birmingham.  We want as many people as possible to be able to use this website. For example, that means you should be able to:

  • navigate most of the website using speech recognition software.
  • listen to most of the website using a screen reader (including the most recent versions of JAWS, NVDA and VoiceOver).

How accessible this website is

We know some parts of this website are not accessible according to the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1 Level AA.

  • Images and form image buttons do not always have appropriate, equivalent alternative text.
  • Semantic mark-ups, regions/landmarks, lists and emphasised or special text may be missing.
  • The reading and navigation order may not be intuitive.
  • Text and images of text may not have a contrast ratio of 4.5:1.
  • Zooming and scaling is disabled, affecting use on mobile devices.
  • There may be loss of content and functionality when content is presented at a width of 320 pixels.
  • Dashboard icons do not have a contrast ratio of 3:1.
  • Not all functionality is available using the keyboard.
  • There is no link provided to skip navigation and other page elements that are repeated across web pages.
  • The login page does not describe the application.
  • The navigation order or links, form elements, etc., may not be logical and intuitive.
  • The purpose of each link (or form image button or image map hotspot cannot be determined from the link text alone or from the link text and its context.
  • The current keyboard focus is not sufficiently visually apparent.
  • Where an interface component (link, button, etc.) presents text (or images of text), the accessible name (label, alternative text, aria-label, etc.) for does not always match the visible text.
  • The language for the page is not identified using the HTML lang attribute.
  • Suggestions are not always provided for fixing input errors in timely and accessible manner.
  • Mark-up is not always used in a way that facilitates accessibility. This includes following the HTML/XHTML specifications and using forms, form labels, frame titles, etc. appropriately.
  • Important status messages are not announced to screen reader users.

Feedback and contact information

If you need information on this website in a different format, please log a call with the IT Service Desk:
https:\\universityofbirmingham.servicenow.com/it-portal/
or telephone 0121 414 7171 (47171 on-campus).

We’ll consider your request and get back to you in 10 working days. You do not need to give us details of your disability or accessibility need as part of your request. 

Reporting accessibility problems with the website

We’re always looking to improve the accessibility of this website. If you find any problems not listed on this page or think we’re not meeting accessibility requirements, contact the IT Service desk
https:\\universityofbirmingham.servicenow.com/it-portal/ or telephone 0121 414 7171 (47171 on-campus)

You do not need to give us details of your disability or accessibility need as part of your report. 

Enforcement procedure

If you haven’t received a response to an accessible format request within 10 working days, or if you are unhappy with the response you have received from the University about any accessibility-related issue, you can make a complaint to the University by updating your Service Desk ticket in the first instance:

https:\\universityofbirmingham.servicenow.com/it-portal/
or telephone 0121 414 7171 (47171 on-campus).

You do not need to give us details of your disability or accessibility need as part of your complaint.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is responsible for enforcing the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) (No. 2) Accessibility Regulations 2018 (the ‘accessibility regulations’). If you’re not happy with how we respond to your complaint, contact the Equality Advisory and Support Service (EASS).

Technical information about this website's accessibility

The University of Birmingham is committed to making its website accessible, in accordance with the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) (No. 2) Accessibility Regulations 2018.

Compliance status

This website is not compliant with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines version 2.1 AA standard.

Non-accessible content

The content listed below is non-accessible for the following reasons.

Non-compliance with the accessibility regulations

The software authoring company has committed to addressing these issues by 30 April 2022:

Only a sample of pages were tested. The issues found may be present on other screens which may contain other issues.

The University of Birmingham Logo doesn’t have any Alt Text.

This fails WCAG success criterion 1.1.1 (non-text content) which recommends that images and form image buttons to always have appropriate, equivalent alternative text. This is also found on the Group Dashboard page.

On the login page, ‘Forgot Password’ is a local link with no destination. Site pages do not always use headers, regions or landmarks appropriately. Search buttons are not labelled. This fails WCAG success criterion 1.3.1 (Information and Relationships) which recommends that semantic mark-ups, regions/landmarks, lists and emphasised or special text are used appropriately. This issue was also found on the Group Management page.

A large number of items are not in the tab index. This fails the WCAG success criterion 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequence) which recommends that the reading and navigation order is logical and intuitive.

On the login page the following items have insufficient contrast: Username, Password, Forgot Password link, Login, Login with single sign-on. On the dashboard the contrast of the tiles and the search input field contrast is too low. This fails WCAG success criterion 1.4.3 (Contrast Minimum) which recommends that text and images of text have a contrast ratio of at least 4.5:1. This issue was also found on the Group pages tested.

At a width of 320 pixels on the dashboard the Home icon and text overlap each other and for all pages feedback option is off the screen. This fails WCAG success criterion 1.4.5 (Images of Text) and 1.4.10 (Reflow) which recommends that there is no loss of content or functionality and ne need to scroll horizontally when content is presented at a width of 320 pixels. On the Group Dashboard page the Reflow issue is found as content is not visible without having to scroll in two dimensions. 

Zooming and scaling is disabled, affecting use on mobile devices.

This fails WCAG success criterion 1.4.4 (Resize text) which recommends that the page is readable and functional when zoomed to 200%.

On the dashboard the icons in coloured boxes have insufficient contrast. This fails WCAG success criterion 1.4.11 (Non-text Contrast) which recommends a contrast ration of at least 3:1 for differentiating graphical objects. This issue was also found on the Group pages tested.

In the application the following are not accessible by the keyboard: Data Manager Menu, the Settings Menu, and anything on the main screen other than the ‘add message’ icon and the Dashboard breadcrumb. This fails WCAG success criterion 2.1.1 (Keyboard) which recommends that all page functionality is available via the keyboard. This issue was also found on the Group pages tested.

There is a header and menu on screen at all times, and to reach a new screen you have to tab through the menu. This fails WCAG success criterion 2.4.1 (Bypass Blocks) which recommends a link to skip navigation and other page elements that are repeated across web pages. This issue was also found on the Group pages tested.

The page title for the login page is not descriptive enough, it should be ‘Log in to Cards Online – University of Birmingham’, or similar. This fails WCAG success criterion 2.4.2 (Page Titled) which recommends that a web page has a descriptive and informative page title.

Menu items Data Manager and Setting Menu and anything apart from Add Message and the Dashboard breadcrumb are not accessible via the keyboard. The ‘Add Message’ screen does not transfer focus to the popup it opens, or receive it back when the popup is closed. This fails WCAG success criterion 2.4.3 (Focus Order) which recommends that the navigation order of links, form elements, etc., is logical and intuitive. This issue was also found on the Group pages tested.

The left hand menu links don’t convey their purpose clearly when using a keyboard and screen reader. The tab runs down the icons and not the text and the icons aren’t described clearly. This fails WCAG success criterion 2.4.4 (Link Purpose (In Context)) which recommends that the purpose of each link (or form image button or image map hotspot) can be determined from the link text alone, or from the link text and its context (e.g., surrounding text, list item, previous heading, or table headers). This issue was also found on the Group pages tested.

The focus indicator is indistinct. This fails WCAG success criterion 2.4.7 (Focus Visible) which recommends that it is visually apparent which page element has the current keyboard focus (i.e. as you tab through the page, you can see where you are).

The visible name icon ‘My account’ has the accessible name ‘account circle’. This fails WCAG success criterion 2.5.3 (Label In Name) which recommends that if an interface component (link, button, etc.) presents text (or images of text), the accessible name (label, alternative text, aria-label, etc.) for that component must include the visible text.

The language of site pages is not set. This fails success criterion 3.1.1 (Language Of Page) which recommends that the language of page content that is in a different language is identified using the lang attribute (e.g., <blockquote lang="es">). This issue was also found on the Group Management page. This issue was also found on the Group Dashboard page.

On the login page there are no suggestions for fixing inputting errors for username and password. This fails WCAG success criterion 3.3.3 (Error Suggestion) which recommends that suggestions are provided for  fixing input errors in timely and accessible manner.

On the dashboard the large coloured panels are not identified with roles or have accessible names. This fails the WCAG success criterion 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) which recommends that mark-up is used in a way that facilitates accessibility. This includes following the HTML/XHTML specifications and using forms, form labels, frame titles, etc. appropriately. This issue was also found on the Group pages tested.

On the login page the error message for inputting invalid username or password is not announced. This fails WCAG success criterion 4.1.3 (Status Messages) which recommends that important status messages are announced to screen reader users.

Preparation of this accessbility statement

This statement was prepared on 14 April 2021. It was last updated on 14 April 2021.

This website was last tested on 11 February 2021. The test was carried out by the University of Birmingham. The Logon, Unit Dashboard and Group Management and Dashboard pages were tested.

 

Colleges

Professional Services